Habitation Map: Main dictation of the study is the rate of vulnerability in terms of increasing urban area with respect to the forest area. Considering the Land cover components of the earth surface, the forestry and natural vegetation is one of the greatest influencing factors to determine the development of Land to be utilized for the human society.
Most important facets of this study area to demarcate the deforestation and vulnerable area of defragmentation.. So the main motto of this study is to conceive the Limit of Sustaining the concerned forest cover of a growing urban area.
- Habitation
- Commercial
- Open land
- Water
Habitation Mean Centre, 2013
| FID | Shape * | Id | XCoord | YCoord |
| 0 | Point | 0 | 504253.045002 | 2476557.77648 |
Table No3: Habitation Mean Center,2013
Habitation Mean Centre, 2018
| FID | Shape * | Id | XCoord | YCoord |
| 0 | Point | 0 | 503916.895771 | 2476083.40092 |
Table No4: Habitation Mean Center,2018
Habitation Statistics, 2013 to 2018
| Year | Residential in sqKm | Commercial in sqKm | Total | |
| 1 | 2013 | 16.97 | 0.45 | 17.42 |
| 2 | 2018 | 18.68 | 0.45 | 19.13 |
Table No6: Habitation Statistics, 2013-2018
Habitation Increase Statistics, 2018
| Year | Residential in sqKm | Commercial in sqKm | Total | |
| 1 | 2018 | 1.75 | 0 | 1.75 |
Table No7: Habitation Increase Statistics,2018
Comparison between two years:
Summarized data of habitation and vegetation change from 2013 to 2018
| Area in | 2013 | 2018 | |||
| Subject | Built up (q0) | Vegetation(p0) | Built up(qn) | Vegetation(pn) | |
| 1. | Sq. Km | 17.42 | 238.19 | 19.13 | 234.1 |
Tabular presentation of habitation and vegetation change from 2013 to 2018
| Subject | q0 | p0 | qn | pn | q0p0 | q0pn | qnp0 | qnpn |
| 1. | 17.42 | 238.19 | 19.13 | 234.1 | 4149.2698 | 4078.022 | 4556.5747 | 4478.333 |
Ref. Statistical Methods, NG Das, Volume II, 2008
Results:
The rest 20% by the open parcels of land or others.
| Sl No. | Subject | Value | Indication/s | Remarks |
| 1 | Mean Centre of Vegetation | The means centres does not differ | Indicating the sample does not disperse away and has the consistency | From 2013 to 2018 |
| 2. | Mean Centre of Habitation | The mean centre of the cluster shifts abou 541.40 m | Indicating the sample does not disperses a little | From 2013 to 2018 |
| 3. | Vegetation Transformation | Vegetation decreases by 4.09 sq. km | Indicating that the deforestation occurs | From 2013 to 2018 |
| 4. | Habitation transformation | Habitation increases by 1.71 sq. km | Indicating that the built ups develop in terms of vegetation | In 2018 |
| 5. |
Interrelation change ratio |
The interrelation change ration of 1.71 : 4.09 (41.80% approx) | The elements are inversely proportional to each other | In 2018 |
| 6. | Regression | Low Positive trend | Indicating that the dependent variable habitation changes positively once the vegetation decreases | In 2018 |
| 7. | In 2018 | |||
| 8. | Fischer’s Ideal Index | The IF has been 100 | Indicates that the decrease of vegetation is high in terms of built up cluster growth |